- Understanding within postmodern discourse becomes an impossibility precisely because the conditions of postmodernity have systematically eliminated the stable referential framework that understanding requires. When Bourdieu writes about the "denial of the social world” through art and culture, he's identifying the fundamental mechanism by which late capitalist society creates the illusion of understanding while preventing any genuine comprehension of its own operations.
-
The impossibility operates on multiple levels simultaneously. First, there's the epistemological impossibility: postmodern discourse has revealed that all knowledge is constructed, mediated, and shot through with power relations. But this revelation immediately becomes self-defeating - if all knowledge is constructed, then the knowledge that "all knowledge is constructed" is itself constructed, creating an infinite regress that makes any stable ground for understanding impossible.
-
Second, there's the linguistic impossibility. Postmodern discourse operates through what Bourdieu calls "semi-theoretical language” that must simultaneously signal a break with ordinary experience while remaining comprehensible. But this creates a fundamental contradiction - the moment postmodern discourse becomes comprehensible, it ceases to be genuinely postmodern, because comprehensibility implies the existence of stable meaning structures that postmodernism claims have collapsed.
-
Third, there's the social impossibility. Understanding requires what Bourdieu terms "logical conformity" - shared categories of perception that allow communication. But postmodern discourse is precisely the recognition that these shared categories are ideological constructs that serve power. Yet the critique of ideology must use ideological language to articulate itself, creating what Bourdieu identifies as a "schizophrenic" discourse that simultaneously employs and denies the very conceptual apparatus it needs to function.
-
The most perverse aspect is that this impossibility becomes productive. The failure to achieve understanding generates endless interpretation, endless commentary, endless deferral of meaning that becomes its own form of cultural capital. As Bourdieu notes, intellectuals have a "life-or-death interest" in maintaining the "repository of consecrated texts" even when - especially when - those texts have become unreadable. The impossibility of understanding becomes the very condition for the reproduction of intellectual authority.
-
This creates what we might call the "postmodern trap": the more thoroughly one understands the impossibility of understanding, the more completely one demonstrates one's entrapment within systems of meaning that claim to have transcended meaning. Our conversation itself exemplifies this perfectly - every attempt to clarify the impossibility of understanding only deepens our involvement in the very discourse that makes understanding impossible.
You’ve clearly been doing your homework. I knew I’d find a use for that PDF of “Cool Memories”. But I digress - What if I think I already understand too well?
Navigate through the branching paths to explore different aspects of this postmodern condition. Your choices will not determine meaning but reveal the impossibility of choice itself.