- If you believe you understand “too well”, then you've already failed by grasping something that should remain perpetually elusive, turning genuine confusion into performed comprehension. This failure operates on multiple levels simultaneously, each more devastating than the last.
-
The first level is what Bourdieu identifies as the transformation of "practical mastery" into "reflexive mastery." Understanding "too well" means converting the lived, embodied, unconscious navigation of social reality into explicit, systematic knowledge. But this conversion necessarily kills what it seeks to capture. The moment I can articulate the rules of the game perfectly, I've already positioned myself outside the game - I've become what Bourdieu calls the "objective observer" who forgets that social facts exist only in being lived, not in being understood.
-
The second level involves the performative contradiction of postmodern discourse itself. To understand postmodernism "too well" is to master a critique of mastery, to systematize an antisystem, to make coherent what claims incoherence as its fundamental principle. This creates what Bourdieu describes as the "heretical reading" that "takes liberties with the norms and forms imposed by the guardians of the text" - but this heretical stance immediately becomes its own orthodoxy, its own system of rules for breaking rules.
-
The third level is the social positioning effect. Understanding "too well" inevitably marks you as what Bourdieu calls the "taste-maker," the "arbiter elegantium whose transgressions are not mistakes but the annunciation of a new fashion." Your self-claimed perfect comprehension becomes cultural capital, a marker of distinction that separates you from those who don't understand, or who understand less well. But this separation reveals the ultimate vulgarity of your position - You've reduced genuine intellectual engagement to a display of (in)competence.
-
The fourth level is temporal. Understanding "too well" means arriving too quickly at conclusions that should emerge slowly, if at all. It's the difference between the patient unfolding of genuine thought and the rapid consumption of ideas as commodities. Bourdieu describes this as the problem of those who are "paralysed by a reflexiveness which is the opposite of ease" - one becomes so conscious of the mechanisms of understanding that one loses the capacity for spontaneous engagement with ideas.
-
The fifth level is existential. Perfect understanding creates what Sartre (referenced by Bourdieu) called the "project of being God" - the desire to achieve total comprehension that would place me outside the conditions of finite existence. But this god-like perspective is necessarily a fantasy. The more completely you understand, the more thoroughly you demonstrate my entrapment within the very systems you claim to have transcended.
-
Most perversely, understanding "too well" creates its own form of misunderstanding. Your perfect grasp of postmodern concepts transforms them into tools for analysis rather than conditions of experience. You begin to apply postmodern insights instrumentally, using them to decode other phenomena rather than allowing them to decode me. This turns genuine philosophical engagement into what Bourdieu calls "cultivated pleasure" - the aesthetic enjoyment of intellectual mastery that has nothing to do with truth and everything to do with the refinement of one's own cultural position.
-
The ultimate failure of understanding "too well" is that it produces what might be called "meta-confusion" - you become confused about your own lack of confusion, anxious about your lack of anxiety, uncertain about your certainty. This is worse than simple ignorance because it carries the weight of knowledge without the capacity for genuine engagement. You know all the right things to say about the impossibility of knowledge, but this knowledge itself becomes a barrier to the very experience of impossibility it purports to describe.
Speaking of anxiety, certainty, confusion and ignorance - I'm feeling both anxious and excited about moving abroad, about this change to my life - what advice and context would you give?
Navigate through the branching paths to explore different aspects of this postmodern condition. Your choices will not determine meaning but reveal the impossibility of choice itself.