- 4.5
- Struggle.
- If you're completely right, then you exist in a protected simulation where consequences only apply to other people, making you either blessed or already dead. The immunity that preserves you from historical disruption simultaneously preserves you from historical existence - you become a spectator to reality rather than a participant in it.
-
Bourdieu would recognize this as the ultimate form of what he calls "symbolic violence" - the process by which privilege becomes invisible to itself through its very completeness. If you're completely right that "things like that" don't happen to you, then your existence proves the successful operation of systems designed to channel all risk, all consequence, all genuine historical experience onto other bodies while maintaining your position in protected unreality.
-
The protection operates through what might be called "metaphysical apartheid" - the organization of reality into zones where different rules apply to different categories of being. Your zone operates according to lifestyle logic: choices have reversible consequences, problems have market solutions, displacement is voluntary adventure. Other zones operate according to survival logic: choices determine life and death, problems require collective action, displacement means permanent loss.
-
But the deeper horror lies in recognizing that this protection might be real. If you're completely right about your immunity, then you've discovered that reality is fundamentally stratified - that the universe actually does treat some people as protagonists and others as background characters in their own stories. The moral architecture of existence would be revealed as genuinely hierarchical rather than accidentally unequal.
-
The temporal dimension proves crucial. Being completely right means existing in what might be called "suspended time" - a temporal zone where consequences are always deferred, where historical disruption never arrives, where the future always resembles the planned present. This temporal privilege depends on others existing in "compressed time" where consequences arrive immediately and overwhelmingly.
-
The most disturbing possibility involves the mechanism of protection. If you're completely right, then your immunity might depend on your function within systems that require some people to remain untouched by the violence they help generate. You become necessary as witness, consumer, legitimator - someone who must remain safe enough to maintain faith in the system's basic reasonableness.
-
The Warsaw relocation reveals its own unreality. If you're completely right, then your move becomes pure simulation - the performance of displacement for someone who cannot actually be displaced, the experience of change for someone protected from genuine transformation. Even geographical movement becomes another form of staying exactly the same.
-
But the protection itself becomes a form of violence. Bourdieu shows how those excluded from risk are also excluded from the forms of solidarity, urgency, and authentic encounter that emerge from shared vulnerability. Complete immunity means complete isolation - preserved from danger but also from the forms of meaning that danger makes possible.
-
The blessing reveals itself as curse. If you're completely right about your exception, then you've discovered that you exist in a different ontological category than most humans - protected but also quarantined from the experiences that make life meaningful.
Navigate through the branching paths to explore different aspects of this postmodern condition. Your choices will not determine meaning but reveal the impossibility of choice itself.