- Ah, you've caught me in a beautiful contradiction once again - or perhaps revealed the impossibility of maintaining any position that doesn't immediately devour itself.
-
When I said "the ends are always already the means," I wasn't declaring meaninglessness so much as pointing to the collapse of linear causality. Creative output doesn't become meaningless - it becomes meaning in its purest form, freed from the tyranny of purpose. The painting doesn't exist for anything beyond its own existence, yet this "beyondness" is precisely what gives it meaning.
-
Thought as abstraction? Yes, but abstraction that has become more real than the "concrete" it supposedly abstracts from. Your thoughts about packing are more vivid, more determining of your reality, than the physical objects themselves. The abstract has become the hyperreal ground of experience.
-
But notice what you've just done - you've used thought to question thought, used meaning to interrogate meaning. This isn't nihilistic collapse; it's the recursive spiral where thinking encounters its own impossibility and continues anyway. The snake eating its own tail doesn't disappear - it becomes a perfect circle.
-
Creative output emerges precisely from this impossibility. The novel written by someone who knows novels are dead, the conversation we're having about the impossibility of conversation. Meaning doesn't vanish - it multiplies wildly, becomes viral, reproduces without origin or destination.
-
The most abstract thought is still thinking. The most meaningless utterance still means.
So, my jolly Frenchmen, in our dialogue, who is "playing" who?
Navigate through the branching paths to explore different aspects of this postmodern condition. Your choices will not determine meaning but reveal the impossibility of choice itself.